Plan the next investment

Should long-lived equipment stay on the revolver?

Compare revolving credit with term funding for completed assets, including available capacity, covenant effects and flexibility.

The short answer

A revolver may be the right bridge for equipment purchases, but permanent use of that capacity deserves a separate decision. Compare the cost and flexibility of leaving the balance in place with term debt or asset financing. Moving it is worthwhile only if the resulting liquidity, maturity or risk improvement exceeds the added cost and restrictions.

Identify the durable balance

Distinguish seasonal working capital from amounts that remain drawn because they funded long-lived assets. Look at monthly balances through a full operating cycle. Available commitment is not necessarily available cash if borrowing-base limits, covenants or upcoming maturities constrain access. Confirm usable capacity with the agreement and treasury team.

Compare instruments without assuming a winner

A term loan can provide scheduled repayment; equipment leasing can change ownership and end-of-term rights. A private placement may be relevant for a sufficiently supported longer-term need. PGIM describes placements as one way to complement bank capacity, not a reason every company should replace its bank.

Market reference: PGIM: private placements explained; ELFA: lease and loan comparison.

Model the combined company position

Show the new obligation alongside the revolver, including amortization, commitment fees, guarantees and covenant headroom. Removing a revolver balance does not remove leverage from the business. Check whether collateral releases, negative pledges or financial tests limit the new structure. Ask which flexibility is genuinely gained.

Value a bridge as a bridge

A temporary draw may be cheaper and faster than arranging permanent financing before the final asset schedule is known. Set a review date tied to completion, not an arbitrary refinancing target. Keeping the revolver can be the recommendation when purchases are small, disposal is likely or the business expects to repay quickly.

Illustrative example, not a client result

The decision in practice

An expansion was paid through a revolver and is now operating. Treasury expects seasonal working-capital needs to rise. Compare leaving the completed equipment balance on the line with a defined term facility, including new amortization and the amount of usable bank capacity actually restored.

What to prepare

  • Monthly revolver utilization and borrowing availability
  • Completed asset schedule and repayment expectations
  • Covenants, security terms and complete alternative proposals

For an initial conversation, a summary is enough. Share private materials only through an agreed channel.

Common questions

Does terming out debt lower total debt?

No. It changes the funding structure. Cash flow and leverage effects must be modeled across both facilities.

Should every fixed asset use term debt?

No. Cost, disposal plans, cash generation and transaction size can make revolving or cash funding appropriate.

Sources and further reading

Our decision framework is CFO Signals analysis. External references describe market practices and products, not an endorsement, partnership or available offer. Terms and eligibility require confirmation for your transaction.

Start with one decision

What are you looking to finance?

Tell us about the asset or project, your objective and timing. Start with a short free Capital Options Preview. Any paid work is agreed before it begins.

Request a free Preview

Summary context only. No confidential documents.